Monday, November 16, 2009

Obama's town hall meeting - full text

This is the full transcript of the Q&A between President Barack Obama and students at the Shanghai Science & Technology Museum, Shanghai, China. Monday 16th november 2009

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Good afternoon. It is a great honor for me to be here in Shanghai, and to have this opportunity to speak with all of you. I'd like to thank Fudan University's President Yang for his hospitality and his gracious welcome.  I'd also like to thank our outstanding Ambassador, Jon Huntsman, who exemplifies the deep ties and respect between our nations. I don't know what he said, but I hope it was good.  (Laughter.)  

What I'd like to do is to make some opening comments, and then what I'm really looking forward to doing is taking questions, not only from students who are in the audience, but also we've received questions online, which will be asked by some of the students who are here in the audience, as well as by Ambassador Huntsman.  And I am very sorry that my Chinese is not as good as your English, but I am looking forward to this chance to have a dialogue. 

This is my first time traveling to China, and I'm excited to see this majestic country. Here, in Shanghai, we see the growth that has caught the attention of the world -- the soaring skyscrapers, the bustling streets and entrepreneurial activity.  And just as I'm impressed by these signs of China's journey to the 21st century, I'm eager to see those ancient places that speak to us from China's distant past. 

Tomorrow and the next day I hope to have a chance when I'm in Beijing to see the majesty of the Forbidden City and the wonder of the Great Wall. Truly, this is a nation that encompasses both a rich history and a belief in the promise of the future. 

The same can be said of the relationship between our two countries. Shanghai, of course, is a city that has great meaning in the history of the relationship between the United States and China. It was here, 37 years ago, that the Shanghai Communique opened the door to a new chapter of engagement between our governments and among our people. However, America's ties to this city -- and to this country -- stretch back further, to the earliest days of America's independence. 

In 1784, our founding father, George Washington, commissioned the Empress of China, a ship that set sail for these shores so that it could pursue trade with the Qing Dynasty. Washington wanted to see the ship carry the flag around the globe, and to forge new ties with nations like China. This is a common American impulse -- the desire to reach for new horizons, and to forge new partnerships that are mutually beneficial. 

Over the two centuries that have followed, the currents of history have steered the relationship between our countries in many directions. And even in the midst of tumultuous winds, our people had opportunities to forge deep and even dramatic ties. For instance, Americans will never forget the hospitality shown to our pilots who were shot down over your soil during World War II, and cared for by Chinese civilians who risked all that they had by doing so. And Chinese veterans of that war still warmly greet those American veterans who return to the sites where they fought to help liberate China from occupation. 

A different kind of connection was made nearly 40 years ago when the frost between our countries began to thaw through the simple game of table tennis. The very unlikely nature of this engagement contributed to its success -- because for all our differences, both our common humanity and our shared curiosity were revealed. As one American player described his visit to China -- "[The]people are just like us…The country is very similar to America, but still very different." 

Of course this small opening was followed by the achievement of the Shanghai Communique, and the eventual establishment of formal relations between the United States and China in 1979.  And in three decades, just look at how far we have come. 

In 1979, trade between the United States and China stood at roughly $5 billion -- today it tops over $400 billion each year. The commerce affects our people's lives in so many ways.  America imports from China many of the computer parts we use, the clothes we wear; and we export to China machinery that helps power your industry.  This trade could create even more jobs on both sides of the Pacific, while allowing our people to enjoy a better quality of life. And as demand becomes more balanced, it can lead to even broader prosperity.  

In 1979, the political cooperation between the United States and China was rooted largely in our shared rivalry with the Soviet Union. Today, we have a positive, constructive and comprehensive relationship that opens the door to partnership on the key global issues of our time -- economic recovery and the development of clean energy; stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and the scourge of climate change; the promotion of peace and security in Asia and around the globe.  All of these issues will be on the agenda tomorrow when I meet with President Hu. 

And in 1979, the connections among our people were limited. Today, we see the curiosity of those ping-pong players manifested in the ties that are being forged across many sectors.  The second highest number of foreign students in the United States come from China, and we've seen a 50 percent increase in the study of Chinese among our own students. There are nearly 200 "friendship cities" drawing our communities together. American and Chinese scientists cooperate on new research and discovery.  And of course, Yao Ming is just one signal of our shared love of basketball -- I'm only sorry that I won't be able to see a Shanghai Sharks game while I'm visiting. 

It is no coincidence that the relationship between our countries has accompanied a period of positive change. China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty -- an accomplishment unparalleled in human history -- while playing a larger role in global events. And the United States has seen our economy grow along with the standard of living enjoyed by our people, while bringing the Cold War to a successful conclusion. 

There is a Chinese proverb: "Consider the past, and you shall know the future."  Surely, we have known setbacks and challenges over the last 30 years. Our relationship has not been without disagreement and difficulty. But the notion that we must be adversaries is not predestined -- not when we consider the past.  Indeed, because of our cooperation, both the United States and China are more prosperous and more secure.  We have seen what is possible when we build upon our mutual interests, and engage on the basis of mutual respect.

And yet the success of that engagement depends upon understanding -- on sustaining an open dialogue, and learning about one another and from one another. For just as that American table tennis player pointed out -- we share much in common as human beings, but our countries are different in certain ways.  

I believe that each country must chart its own course. China is an ancient nation, with a deeply rooted culture. The United States, by comparison, is a young nation, whose culture is determined by the many different immigrants who have come to our shores, and by the founding documents that guide our democracy. 

Those documents put forward a simple vision of human affairs, and they enshrine several core principles -- that all men and women are created equal, and possess certain fundamental rights; that government should reflect the will of the people and respond to their wishes; that commerce should be open, information freely accessible; and that laws, and not simply men, should guarantee the administration of justice.

Of course, the story of our nation is not without its difficult chapters. In many ways -- over many years -- we have struggled to advance the promise of these principles to all of our people, and to forge a more perfect union. We fought a very painful civil war, and freed a portion of our population from slavery. It took time for women to be extended the right to vote, workers to win the right to organize, and for immigrants from different corners of the globe to be fully embraced. Even after they were freed, African Americans persevered through conditions that were separate and not equal, before winning full and equal rights. 

None of this was easy. But we made progress because of our belief in those core principles, which have served as our compass through the darkest of storms. That is why Lincoln could stand up in the midst of civil war and declare it a struggle to see whether any nation, conceived in liberty, and "dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal" could long endure.

That is why Dr. Martin Luther King could stand on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and ask that our nation live out the true meaning of its creed. That's why immigrants from China to Kenya could find a home on our shores; why opportunity is available to all who would work for it; and why someone like me, who less than 50 years ago would have had trouble voting in some parts of America, is now able to serve as its President.

And that is why America will always speak out for these core principles around the world. We do not seek to impose any system of government on any other nation, but we also don't believe that the principles that we stand for are unique to our nation. These freedoms of expression and worship -- of access to information and political participation -- we believe are universal rights. 

They should be available to all people, including ethnic and religious minorities -- whether they are in the United States, China, or any nation. Indeed, it is that respect for universal rights that guides America's openness to other countries; our respect for different cultures; our commitment to international law; and our faith in the future.

These are all things that you should know about America. I also know that we have much to learn about China. Looking around at this magnificent city -- and looking around this room -- I do believe that our nations hold something important in common, and that is a belief in the future. Neither the United States nor China is content to rest on our achievements. For while China is an ancient nation, you are also clearly looking ahead with confidence, ambition, and a commitment to see that tomorrow's generation can do better than today's. 

In addition to your growing economy, we admire China's extraordinary commitment to science and research -- a commitment borne out in everything from the infrastructure you build to the technology you use. China is now the world's largest Internet user -- which is why we were so pleased to include the Internet as a part of today's event. 

This country now has the world's largest mobile phone network, and it is investing in the new forms of energy that can both sustain growth and combat climate change -- and I'm looking forward to deepening the partnership between the United States and China in this critical area tomorrow. But above all, I see China's future in you -- young people whose talent and dedication and dreams will do so much to help shape the 21st century.

I've said many times that I believe that our world is now fundamentally interconnected. The jobs we do, the prosperity we build, the environment we protect, the security that we seek -- all of these things are shared.  And given that interconnection, power in the 21st century is no longer a zero-sum game; one country's success need not come at the expense of another. 

And that is why the United States insists we do not seek to contain China's rise. On the contrary, we welcome China as a strong and prosperous and successful member of the community of nations -- a China that draws on the rights, strengths and creativity of individual Chinese like you.

To return to the proverb -- consider the past. We know that more is to be gained when great powers cooperate than when they collide. That is a lesson that human beings have learned time and again, and that is the example of the history between our nations. And I believe strongly that cooperation must go beyond our government. It must be rooted in our people -- in the studies we share, the business that we do, the knowledge that we gain, and even in the sports that we play. And these bridges must be built by young men and women just like you and your counterparts in America. 

That's why I'm pleased to announce that the United States will dramatically expand the number of our students who study in China to 100,000. And these exchanges mark a clear commitment to build ties among our people, as surely as you will help determine the destiny of the 21st century. And I'm absolutely confident that America has no better ambassadors to offer than our young people. For they, just like you, are filled with talent and energy and optimism about the history that is yet to be written. 

So let this be the next step in the steady pursuit of cooperation that will serve our nations, and the world. And if there's one thing that we can take from today's dialogue, I hope that it is a commitment to continue this dialogue going forward. 

So thank you very much.  And I look forward now to taking some questions from all of you. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

So -- I just want to make sure this works. This is a tradition, by the way, that is very common in the United States at these town hall meetings. And what we're going to do is I will just -- if you are interested in asking a question, you can raise your hands. I will call on you. And then I will alternate between a question from the audience and an Internet question from one of the students who prepared the questions, as well as I think Ambassador Huntsman may have a question that we were able to obtain from the Web site of our embassy.

So let me begin, though, by seeing -- and then what I'll do is I'll call on a boy and then a girl and then -- so we'll go back and forth, so that you know it's fair. All right?  So I'll start with this young lady right in the front.  Why don't we wait for this microphone so everyone can hear you. And what's your name?

Q    My name is (inaudible) and I am a student from Fudan University. Shanghai and Chicago have been sister cities since 1985, and these two cities have conduct a wide range of economic, political, and cultural exchanges. So what measures will you take to deepen this close relationship between cities of the United States and China? And Shanghai will hold the World Exposition next year. Will you bring your family to visit the Expo? Thank you.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, thank you very much for the question. I was just having lunch before I came here with the Mayor of Shanghai, and he told me that he has had an excellent relationship with the city of Chicago -- my home town -- that he's visited there twice. And I think it's wonderful to have these exchanges between cities.

One of the things that I discussed with the Mayor is how both cities can learn from each other on strategies around clean energy, because one of the issues that ties China and America together is how, with an expanding population and a concern for climate change, that we're able to reduce our carbon footprint. 

And obviously in the United States and many developed countries, per capita, per individual, they are already using much more energy than each individual here in China. But as China grows and expands, it's going to be using more energy as well. So both countries have a great interest in finding new strategies.

We talked about mass transit and the excellent rail lines that are being developed in Shanghai.  I think we can learn in Chicago and the United States some of the fine work that's being done on high-speed rail.  

In the United States, I think we are learning how to develop buildings that use much less energy, that are much more energy-efficient. And I know that with Shanghai, as I traveled and I saw all the cranes and all the new buildings that are going up, it's very important for us to start incorporating these new technologies so that each building is energy-efficient when it comes to lighting, when it comes to heating. And so it's a terrific opportunity I think for us to learn from each other.

I know this is going to be a major focus of the Shanghai  World Expo, is the issue of clean energy, as I learned from the Mayor. And so I would love to attend. I'm not sure yet what my schedule is going to be, but I'm very pleased that we're going to have an excellent U.S. pavilion at the Expo, and I understand that we expect as many as 70 million visitors here. So it's going to be very crowded and it's going to be very exciting.

Chicago has had two world expos in its history, and both of those expos ended up being tremendous boosts for the city. So I'm sure the same thing will happen here in Shanghai. Thank you. (Applause.) Why don't we get one of the questions from the Internet?  And introduce yourself, in case -- 

Q    First shall I say it in Chinese, and then the English, OK?

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Yes.

Q  I want to pose a question from the Internet. I want to thank you, Mr. President, for visiting China in your first year in office, and exchange views with us in China. I want to know what are you bringing to China, your visit to China this time, and what will you bring back to the United States? (Applause.) 

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  The main purpose of my trip is to deepen my understanding of China and its vision for the future. I have had several meetings now with President Hu. We participated together in the G20 that was dealing with the economic financial crisis. We have had consultations about a wide range of issues. But I think it's very important for the United States to continually deepen its understanding of China, just as it's important for China to continually deepen its understanding of the United States.

In terms of what I'd like to get out of this meeting, or this visit, in addition to having the wonderful opportunity to see the Forbidden City and the Great Wall, and to meet with all of you -- these are all highlights -- but in addition to that, the discussions that I intend to have with President Hu speak to the point that Ambassador Huntsman made earlier, which is there are very few global challenges that can be solved unless the United States and China agree.  

So let me give you a specific example, and that is the issue we were just discussing of climate change. The United States and China are the world's two largest emitters of greenhouse gases, of carbon that is causing the planet to warm. Now, the United States, as a highly developed country, as I said before, per capita, consumes much more energy and emits much more greenhouse gases for each individual than does China.  On the other hand, China is growing at a much faster pace and it has a much larger population. So unless both of our countries are willing to take critical steps in dealing with this issue, we will not be able to resolve it.  

There's going to be a Copenhagen conference in December in which world leaders are trying to find a recipe so that we can all make commitments that are differentiated so each country would not have the same obligations -- obviously China, which has much more poverty, should not have to do exactly the same thing as the United States -- but all of us should have these certain obligations in terms of what our plan will be to reduce these greenhouse gases.  

So that's an example of what I hope to get out of this meeting -- a meeting of the minds between myself and President Hu about how together the United States and China can show leadership. Because I will tell you, other countries around the world will be waiting for us. They will watch to see what we do. And if they say, ah, you know, the United States and China, they're not serious about this, then they won't be serious either.  That is the burden of leadership that both of our countries now carry. And my hope is, is that the more discussion and dialogue that we have, the more we are able to show this leadership to the world on these many critical issues. OK? (Applause.) 

All right, it's a -- I think it must be a boy's turn now. Right? So I'll call on this young man right here.

Q    (As translated.)  Mr. President, good afternoon. I'm from Tongji University. I want to cite a saying from Confucius: "It is always good to have a friend coming from afar."  In Confucius books, there is a great saying which says that harmony is good, but also we uphold differences. China advocates a harmonious world.  We know that the United States develops a culture that features diversity. I want to know, what will your government do to build a diversified world with different cultures? What would you do to respect the different cultures and histories of other countries?  And what kinds of cooperation we can conduct in the future?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: This is an excellent point. The United States, one of our strengths is that we are a very diverse culture.  We have people coming from all around the world. And so there's no one definition of what an American looks like.  In my own family, I have a father who was from Kenya; I have a mother who was from Kansas, in the Midwest of the United States; my sister is half-Indonesian; she's married to a Chinese person from Canada. So when you see family gatherings in the Obama household, it looks like the United Nations.  (Laughter.)

And that is a great strength of the United States, because it means that we learn from different cultures and different foods and different ideas, and that has made us a much more dynamic society.

Now, what is also true is that each country in this interconnected world has its own culture and its own history and its own traditions. And I think it's very important for the United States not to assume that what is good for us is automatically good for somebody else. And we have to have some modesty about our attitudes towards other countries.

I have to say, though, as I said in my opening remarks, that we do believe that there are certain fundamental principles that are common to all people, regardless of culture. So, for example, in the United Nations we are very active in trying to make sure that children all around the world are treated with certain basic rights -- that if children are being exploited,

if there's forced labor for children, that despite the fact that that may have taken place in the past in many different countries, including the United States, that all countries of the world now should have developed to the point where we are treating children better than we did in the past. That's a universal value.

I believe, for example, the same thing holds true when it comes to the treatment of women. I had a very interesting discussion with the Mayor of Shanghai during lunch right before I came, and he informed me that in many professions now here in China, there are actually more women enrolled in college than there are men, and that they are doing very well. 

I think that is an excellent indicator of progress, because it turns out that if you look at development around the world, one of the best indicators of whether or not a country does well is how well it educates its girls and how it treats its women.  And countries that are tapping into the talents and the energy of women and giving them educations typically do better economically than countries that don't.

So, now, obviously difficult cultures may have different attitudes about the relationship between men and women, but I think it is the view of the United States that it is important for us to affirm the rights of women all around the world. And if we see certain societies in which women are oppressed, or they are not getting opportunities, or there is violence towards women, we will speak out.

Now, there may be some people who disagree with us, and we can have a dialogue about that. But we think it's important, nevertheless, to be true to our ideals and our values. And we -- and when we do so, though, we will always do so with the humility and understanding that we are not perfect and that we still have much progress to make. 

If you talk to women in America, they will tell you that there are still men who have a lot of old-fashioned ideas about the role of women in society. And so we don't claim that we have solved all these problems, but we do think that it's important for us to speak out on behalf of these universal ideals and these universal values. OK?  All right. We're going to take a question from the Internet.

Q    Hello, Mr. President.  It's a great honor to be here and meet you in person.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you.

Q   I will be reading a question selected on the Internet to you, and this question is from somebody from Taiwan.  In his question, he said:  I come from Taiwan.  Now I am doing business on the mainland.  And due to improved cross-straits relations in recent years, my business in China is doing quite well.  So when I heard the news that some people in America would like to propose -- continue selling arms and weapons to Taiwan, I begin to get pretty worried. I worry that this may make our cross-straits relations suffer. 

So I would like to know if, Mr. President, are you supportive of improved cross-straits relations? And although this question is from a businessman, actually, it's a question of keen concern to all of us young Chinese students, so we'd really like to know your position on this question. Thank you. (Applause.)

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Thank you. Well, I have been clear in the past that my administration fully supports a one-China policy, as reflected in the three joint communiqués that date back several decades, in terms of our relations with Taiwan as well as our relations with the People's Republic of China. We don't want to change that policy and that approach.  

I am very pleased with the reduction of tensions and the improvement in cross-straits relations, and it is my deep desire and hope that we will continue to see great improvement between Taiwan and the rest of -- and the People's Republic in resolving many of these issues.  

One of the things that I think that the United States, in terms of its foreign policy and its policy with respect to China, is always seeking is ways that through dialogue and negotiations, problems can be solved.  We always think that's the better course.  And I think that economic ties and commercial ties that are taking place in this region are helping to lower a lot of the tensions that date back before you were born or even before I was born.  

Now, there are some people who still look towards the past when it comes to these issues, as opposed to looking towards the future. I prefer to look towards the future. And as I said, I think the commercial ties that are taking place -- there's something about when people think that they can do business and make money that makes them think very clearly and not worry as much about ideology. And I think that that's starting to happen in this region, and we are very supportive of that process. OK?

Let's see, it's a girl's turn now, right?  Yes, right there. Yes. Hold on, let's get -- whoops, I'm sorry, they took the mic back here. I'll call on you next. Go ahead, and then I'll go up here later. Go ahead. 

Q  Thank you.  

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  I'll call on you later. But I'll on her first and then I'll call on you afterwards. Go ahead.

Q  OK, thank you. Mr. President, I'm a student from Shanghai Jiao Tong University. I have a question concerning the Nobel Prize for Peace. In your opinion, what's the main reason that you were honored the Nobel Prize for Peace?  And will it give you more responsibility and pressure to -- more pressure and the responsibility to promote world peace?  And will it bring you -- will it influence your ideas while dealing with the international affairs? Thank you very much.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you. That was an excellent question. I have to say that nobody was more surprised than me about winning the Nobel Prize for Peace. Obviously it's a great honor. I don't believe necessarily that it's an honor I deserve, given the extraordinary history of people who have won the prize. All I can do is to, with great humility, accept the fact that I think the committee was inspired by the American people and the possibilities of changing not only America but also America's approach to the world.  And so in some ways I think they gave me the prize but I was more just a symbol of the shift in our approach to world affairs that we are trying to promote.

In terms of the burden that I feel, I am extraordinarily honored to be put in the position of President. And as my wife always reminds me when I complain that I'm working too hard, she says, you volunteered for this job.  (Laughter.)  And so you -- there's a saying -- I don't know if there's a similar saying in China -- we have a saying:  "You made your bed, now you have to sleep in it."  And it basically means you have to be careful what you ask for because you might get it.

I think that all of us have obligations for trying to promote peace in the world. It's not always easy to do.  There are still a lot of conflicts in the world that are -- date back for centuries. If you look at the Middle East, there are wars and conflict that are rooted in arguments going back a thousand years. In many parts of the world -- let's say, in the continent of Africa -- there are ethnic and tribal conflicts that are very hard to resolve.  

And obviously, right now, as President of the United States, part of my job is to serve as Commander-in-Chief, and my first priority is to protect the American people. And because of the attacks on 9/11 and the terrorism that has been taking place around the world where innocent people are being killed, it is my obligation to make sure that we root out these terrorist organizations, and that we cooperate with other countries in terms of dealing with this kind of violence.

Nevertheless, although I don't think that we can ever completely eliminate violence between nations or between peoples, I think that we can definitely reduce the violence between peoples -- through dialogue, through the exchange of ideas, through greater understanding between peoples and between cultures.  

And particularly now when just one individual can detonate a bomb that causes so much destruction, it is more important than ever that we pursue these strategies for peace. Technology is a powerful instrument for good, but it has also given the possibility for just a few people to cause enormous damage. And that's why I'm hopeful that in my meetings with President Hu and on an ongoing basis, both the United States and China can work together to try to reduce conflicts that are taking place.

We have to do so, though, also keeping in mind that when we use our military, because we're such big and strong countries, that we have to be self-reflective about what we do; that we have to examine our own motives and our own interests to make sure that we are not simply using our military forces because nobody can stop us. 

That's a burden that great countries, great powers, have, is to act responsibly in the community of nations.  And my hope is, is that the United States and China together can help to create an international norms that reduce conflict around the world. (Applause.)

OK.  All right?  Jon -- I'm going to call on my Ambassador because I think he has a question that was generated through the Web site of our embassy. This was selected, though, by I think one of the members of our U.S. press corps so that --

AMBASSADOR HUNTSMAN: That's right. And not surprisingly, "in a country with 350 million Internet users and 60 million bloggers, do you know of the firewall?"  And second, "should we be able to use Twitter freely" -- is the question.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:  Well, first of all, let me say that I have never used Twitter. I noticed that young people -- they're very busy with all these electronics. My thumbs are too clumsy to type in things on the phone. 

But I am a big believer in technology and I'm a big believer in openness when it comes to the flow of information. I think that the more freely information flows, the stronger the society becomes, because then citizens of countries around the world can hold their own governments accountable. They can begin to think for themselves.That generates new ideas. It encourages creativity. 

And so I've always been a strong supporter of open Internet use. I'm a big supporter of non-censorship. This is part of the tradition of the United States that I discussed before, and I recognize that different countries have different traditions. I can tell you that in the United States, the fact that we have free Internet -- or unrestricted Internet access is a source of strength, and I think should be encouraged.

Now, I should tell you, I should be honest, as President of the United States, there are times where I wish information didn't flow so freely because then I wouldn't have to listen to people criticizing me all the time.  I think people naturally are -- when they're in positions of power sometimes thinks, oh, how could that person say that about me, or that's irresponsible, or -- but the truth is that because in the United States information is free, and I have a lot of critics in the United States who can say all kinds of things about me, I actually think that that makes our democracy stronger and it makes me a better leader because it forces me to hear opinions that I don't want to hear. It forces me to examine what I'm doing on a day-to-day basis to see, am I really doing the very best that I could be doing for the people of the United States.  

 And I think the Internet has become an even more powerful tool for that kind of citizen participation. In fact, one of the reasons that I won the presidency was because we were able to mobilize young people like yourself to get involved through the Internet. Initially, nobody thought we could win because we didn't have necessarily the most wealthy supporters; we didn't have the most powerful political brokers. But through the Internet, people became excited about our campaign and they started to organize and meet and set up campaign activities and events and rallies. And it really ended up creating the kind of bottom-up movement that allowed us to do very well.
     
Now, that's not just true in -- for government and politics. It's also true for business.  You think about a company like Google that only 20 years ago was -- less than 20 years ago was the idea of a couple of people not much older than you. It was a science project. And suddenly because of the Internet, they were able to create an industry that has revolutionized commerce all around the world. So if it had not been for the freedom and the openness that the Internet allows, Google wouldn't exist.  

So I'm a big supporter of not restricting Internet use, Internet access, other information technologies like Twitter. The more open we are, the more we can communicate. And it also helps to draw the world together.  

Think about -- when I think about my daughters, Malia and Sasha -- one is 11, one is 8 -- from their room, they can get on the Internet and they can travel to Shanghai. They can go any place in the world and they can learn about anything they want to learn about. And that's just an enormous power that they have. And that helps, I think, promote the kind of understanding that we talked about.

Now, as I said before, there's always a downside to technology. It also means that terrorists are able to organize on the Internet in ways that they might not have been able to do before. Extremists can mobilize.  And so there's some price that you pay for openness, there's no denying that. But I think that the good outweighs the bad so much that it's better to maintain that openness. And that's part of why I'm so glad that the Internet was part of this forum. OK?

I'm going to take two more questions. And the next one is from a gentleman, I think. Right here, yes. Here's the microphone.

Q   First, I would like to say that it is a great honor for me to stand here to ask you the questions. I think I am so lucky and just appreciate that your speech is so clear that I really do not need such kind of headset.  (Laughter.)  

And here comes my question.  My name is (inaudible) from Fudan University School of Management. And I would like to ask you the question -- is that now that someone has asked you something about the Nobel Peace Prize, but I will not ask you in the same aspect. 

I want to ask you in the other aspect that since it is very hard for you to get such kind of an honorable prize, and I wonder and we all wonder that -- how you struggled to get it. And what's your university/college education that brings you to get such kind of prizes?  We are very curious about it and we would like to invite you to share with us your campus education experiences so as to go on the road of success. 

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, first of all, let me tell you that I don't know if there's a curriculum or course of study that leads you to win the Nobel Peace Prize. (Laughter.)  So I can't guarantee that. But I think the recipe for success is the one that you are already following. Obviously all of you are working very hard, you're studying very hard. You're curious. You're willing to think about new ideas and think for yourself. You know, the people who I meet now that I find most inspiring who are successful I think are people who are not only willing to work very hard but are constantly trying to improve themselves and to think in new ways, and not just accept the conventional wisdom.

Obviously there are many different paths to success, and some of you are going to be going into government service; some of you might want to be teachers or professors; some of you might want to be business people. But I think that whatever field you go into, if you're constantly trying to improve and never satisfied with not having done your best, and constantly asking new questions -- "Are there things that I could be doing differently? Are there new approaches to problems that nobody has thought of before, whether it's in science or technology or in the arts? -- those are usually the people who I think are able to rise about the rest.

The one last piece of advice, though, that I would have that has been useful for me is the people who I admire the most and are most successful, they're not just thinking only about themselves but they're also thinking about something larger than themselves. So they want to make a contribution to society.  They want to make a contribution to their country, their nation, their city. They are interested in having an impact beyond their own immediate lives.

I think so many of us, we get caught up with wanting to make money for ourselves and have a nice car and have a nice house and -- all those things are important, but the people who really make their mark on the world is because they have a bigger ambition. They say, how can I help feed hungry people?  Or, how can I help to teach children who don't have an education?  Or, how can I bring about peaceful resolution of conflicts?  Those are the people I think who end up making such a big difference in the world.  And I'm sure that young people like you are going to be able to make that kind of difference as long as you keep working the way you've been working.

All right? All right, this is going to be the last question, unfortunately. We've run out of time so quickly. Our last Internet question, because I want to make sure that we got all three of our fine students here.

Q   Mr. President, it's a great honor for the last question. And I'm a college student from Fudan University, and today I'm also the representative of China's Youth (inaudible.) And this question I think is from Beijing:  Paid great attention to your Afghanistan policies, and he would like to know whether terrorism is still the greatest security concern for the United States?  And how do you assess the military actions in Afghanistan, or whether it will turn into another Iraqi war? Thank you very much.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I think that's an excellent question. Well, first of all, I do continue to believe that the greatest threat to United States' security are the terrorist networks like al Qaeda. And the reason is, is because even though they are small in number, what they have shown is, is that they have no conscience when it comes to the destruction of innocent civilians. 

And because of technology today, if an organization like that got a weapon of mass destruction on its hands -- a nuclear or a chemical or a biological weapon -- and they used it in a city, whether it's in Shanghai or New York, just a few individuals could potentially kill tens of thousands of people, maybe hundreds of thousands.  So it really does pose an extraordinary threat.

Now, the reason we originally went into Afghanistan was because al Qaeda was in Afghanistan, being hosted by the Taliban. They have now moved over the border of Afghanistan and they are in Pakistan now, but they continue to have networks with other extremist organizations in that region. And I do believe that it is important for us to stabilize Afghanistan so that the people of Afghanistan can protect themselves, but they can also be a partner in reducing the power of these extremist networks.

Now, obviously it is a very difficult thing -- one of the hardest things about my job is ordering young men and women into the battlefield. I often have to meet with the mothers and fathers of the fallen, those who do not come home. And it is a great weight on me. It gives me a heavy heart.  

Fortunately, our Armed Services is -- the young men and women who participate, they believe so strongly in their service to their country that they are willing to go. And I think that it is possible -- working in a broader coalition with our allies in NATO and others that are contributing like Australia -- to help train the Afghans so that they have a functioning government, that they have their own security forces, and then slowly we can begin to pull our troops out because there's no longer that vacuum that existed after the Taliban left.

But it's a difficult task. It's not easy. And ultimately I think in trying to defeat these terrorist extremists, it's important to understand it's not just a military exercise. We also have to think about what motivates young people to become terrorists, why would they become suicide bombers. 

And although there are obviously a lot of different reasons, including I think the perversion of religion, in thinking that somehow these kinds of violent acts are appropriate, part of what's happened in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan is these young people have no education, they have no opportunities, and so they see no way for them to move forward in life, and that leads them into thinking that this is their only option.

And so part of what we want to do in Afghanistan is to find ways that we can train teachers and create schools and improve agriculture so that people have a greater sense of hope. That won't change the ideas of a Osama bin Laden who are very ideologically fixed on trying to strike at the West, but it will change the pool of young people who they can recruit from. And that is at least as important, if not more important over time, as whatever military actions that we can take. OK?

All right, I have had a wonderful time. I am so grateful to all of you. First of all, let me say I'm very impressed with all of your English. Clearly you've been studying very hard. And having a chance to meet with all of you, I think has given me great hope for the future of U.S.-China relations.  

I hope that many of you have the opportunity to come and travel and visit the United States. You will be welcome. I think you will find that the American people feel very warmly towards the people of China. And I am very confident that, with young people like yourselves and the young people that I know in the United States, that our two great countries will continue to prosper and help to bring about a more peaceful and secure world.

So thank you very much everybody.  Thank you.  (Applause.) 

Obama's stage managed town hall meeting

Obama's town hall meeting was scheduled for 12:45 in the Shanghai Science & Technology Museum, though it started a little later than scheduled. The "Meet the Youth" event aimed to connect with Chinese people at a personal level but from the outset it was clear it was stage managed. Obama took to the stage and spent some time talking about the developing of the US relationship with China, through Ping-Pong diplomacy to recent trade deals. He also talked about fundamental core values that America defends. "Universal rights of freedom should be available to all people.. including those in China" Obama said.

After introductory speeches a student asks about sister-city programs and how Obama might deepen them. Another seemingly staged question followed. The questioner, supposedly from Taiwan, but who seemed opposed to US arms sales to Taiwan asks about the development of "cross-straits" ties. Most Taiwanese support US arms sales and while many seek to uphold a good relationship with China there is at the same time a continued wish in the country to have America as a strong ally. As one writer for the Wall Street Journal's blog puts it, "This must be from the Pro-China Taiwan Businessman's Lobby, headquartered in Bejiing…" Obama said he supported the "one China policy" and hoped that relationship between Taiwan and China continued to improve.

Asked about his Nobel prize, Obama declares, "nobody was more surprised than me for being given the Nobel prize for peace." The president said he was not sure he deserved it and that he had a great responsibility having been given the award. But he said peace was something all people should work together to achieve. "I think all of us have obligations to promote peace in the world," Obama told the students.

Next came a question that had been sent through the US Embassy's website and read out by Ambassador Huntsman. "Do you know of the firewall and should we be able to use Twitter freely?" Obama said that he was too clumsy to use Twitter, this despite the @BarackObama feed which he uses to update his supporters. However he continued to state that censorship of the Internet was not in anybody's interest. "The more freely information flows, the stronger a society becomes, because citizens can hold their governments accountable," Obama told the audience. 

Whether by coincidence or by intervention from Chinese authorities the Internet feed froze at this point. Even CNN's coverage ceased. The BBC had already cut away from coverage and anyone hoping to view the broadcast on Xinhua were out of luck despite a declaration on their website that Xinhuanet were to carry the feed live.

Obama's support of unrestricted Internet access was despite the price paid for openness, such as terrorists being able to organise online. In other words the good far outweighs the bad. Terrorism was also mentioned when asked about Afghanistan and the reasons behind America's continued mission in the country. The US president finished up by stating the US is planning to  expand the number of US students studying in China to 100,000. By the time the connection worked again the hour long town hall meeting was over. There were few hard hitting questions and Obama filled much of the time with long dialogues rather than brief answers. Obama then left the hall shaking as many hands as possible as a piano concerto played in background.

Obama is due to arrive in Beijing on Monday afternoon where he will hold far more private talks with China's president Hu Jintao [tvnewswatch: Full transcript of Obama meeting]

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Obama set for Shanghai town hall meeting

President Barack Obama has arrived in China in his continuing Asia tour. But while the media has covered his wide ranging comments, it his statements on China that have come under particular scrutiny [BBC / CNN]

His trip started in Japan where he spoke of the importance of the ongoing ties between Japan and the US. During the first press conference of his Asian tour, both Obama and Japan's Prime Minister Hatoyama covered a number of issues. As regards Japan, Obama said, "The goal remains the same...the defence of Japan with minimal intrusion." The two leaders discussed many security issues ranging from the situation in Afghanistan to the issue of nuclear weapons development in Iran. In respect to the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan, the Japanese PM said he wanted to help not only financially but also in terms of logistical support such as developing the country's educational system and police force.

Both Obama and Hatoyama stressed the importance of developing the 6-Party talks in respect to North Korea. Iran too was discussed and "further pressure" was needed, Hatoyama said. Obama echoed this and set out his hopes for the future. "With respect to nuclear weapons and non proliferation, we share a vision of a world without nuclear weapons," Obama said, "It will take time, it may not ocurr in our own life times." But he insisted it was a worthwhile pursuit.

Both leaders said they had talked about climate change at length. Japan's Hatoyama said he had set a goal into reducing CO2 emissions by some 20 percent by 2015. He also said he was seeking to involve China in moving this forward. President Obama on the subject of climate change said both countries had a "shared commitment of developing clean energy of the future" and said he hoped the discussions would "pave the way for a successful agreement in Copenhagen next month." [Speech in full]

On Saturday, Obama made an address at the Suntory Hall in Tokyo where he spoke at length about the US relationship with China. It was these comments that were of particular focus for western broadcasters. "We look to rising powers with the view that in the 21st century, the national security and economic growth of one country need not come at the expense of another.  I know there are many who question how the United States perceives China's emergence," Obama said. "But as I have said, in an interconnected world, power does not need to be a zero-sum game, and nations need not fear the success of another."

"Now, as with any nation, America will approach China with a focus on our interests.  And it's precisely for this reason that it is important to pursue pragmatic cooperation with China on issues of mutual concern, because no one nation can meet the challenges of the 21st century alone, and the United States and China will both be better off when we are able to meet them together," Obama told the audience, "That's why we welcome China's effort to play a greater role on the world stage -- a role in which their growing economy is joined by growing responsibility.  China's partnership has proved critical in our effort to jumpstart economic recovery.  China has promoted security and stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  And it is now committed to the global nonproliferation regime, and supporting the pursuit of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula."

The US president said that China's strength will benefit other nations including the United States. "The United States does not seek to contain China, nor does a deeper relationship with China mean a weakening of our bilateral alliances.  On the contrary, the rise of a strong, prosperous China can be a source of strength for the community of nations," Obama declared. [Speech in full]
 
He set out his course of action with China saying he will work to deepen "strategic and economic dialogue, and improve communication between our militaries." However, Barack Obama said there were issues of conflict. "Of course, we will not agree on every issue, and the United States will never waver in speaking up for the fundamental values that we hold dear -- and that includes respect for the religion and cultures of all people -- because support for human rights and human dignity is ingrained in America.  But we can move these discussions forward in a spirit of partnership rather than rancor," he said.

Following his departure from Japan, Obama attended the APEC summit in Singapore. During his visit he spoke less about China and more about issues of climate change and of nuclear non-proliferation. He said he had discussed the "importance of meeting common challenges like climate change, nuclear proliferation, and working together in support of G20 efforts to promote a sustained and balanced global economic recovery."

With his arrival in Shanghai late Sunday there was once again increased interest in Obama's Asian tour. Obama stepped off Air Force One holding an umbrella, briefly waving to the assembled media before descending the steps and stepping for the first time on Chinese soil. He is expected to take part in a town hall meeting with hundreds of Chinese students taking part. Details of the event had not been finalised even by early Monday though it was believed the event would be televised locally. The US administration had hoped it would have been broadcast live across China and also streamed on the Internet. However, it is unlikely this may happen. The White House says the debate will be shown via their website.

As for the questions, thousands have been submitted, at least 3,300 on the Xinhuanet site alone. Issues covered include Tibet, the Dalai Lama and Obama's relationship with his wife. According to Xinhua one person is even set to ask if the president has a Facebook account and if he might be added as a friend. The question appears to have been planted. The supposed Facebook user evidently does not realise the social networking site is blocked in China. They would only be able to connect if the Chinese 'netizen' made use of a proxy server in order to circumvent the so-called Great Firewall of China. It is the Internet blocks that many Internet users are focused on and whether the US president makes any comment. One Twitter user who goes by the name Reter said "If Mr. President doesn't mention the Great Firewall during tomorrow's speech, his visit to China is not worth my concern". Another asks, "Has facebook been removed from #gfw to allow Obama to use it during his stay?".Indeed, some Internet users in Shanghai have indicated that there appears to be some relaxation of the blocks. However Facebook, Twitter, blogger and dozens of other sites blocked since at least June this year remain inaccessible.

If the town hall meeting goes ahead it will strean on the White House website at 12:45 in China [04:45 GMT].

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Snow hits Beijing for third time

Beijingers woke up once again to a snow covered city on Thursday with temperatures barely edging above freezing. Gritting lorries were out in force helping to keep the roads open though pavements were still treacherous for many pedestrians. Snow began to fall across the capital at around 7.00 a.m., and with temperatures falling to -1°C the snow soon began to settle. Commuters, wrapped up in thick coats, scarves and hats, braved the cold as they waited for buses. Others could be seen cycling along the icy roads.

Meanwhile, tourists flocked to Tiananmen Square and took pictures while guards stood frozen in front of the portrait of Chairman Mao both covered in a frosty coating of snow. Many schools have been shut down across the capital and children were taking advantage of the winter weather. Even teenagers and young adults were enjoying the snow, building snowmen and playing snowball fights. One young man even made a mobile phone from snow and posed for photographs in Xuanwu Park.

It is the third time this month that snow has fallen in Beijing, the heaviest snowfall in the Chinese capital in 54 years. Heavy snow covered the city on 1st November bringing disruption for airline passengers and motorists. On Tuesday this week snow brought further chaos. Beijing's airport was shut for 4 hours resulting in hundreds of flight cancellations and angry scenes between passengers and airline staff. Thursday snow has already brought disruption to Beijing International airport with more than 100 flights delayed and at least 59 others cancelled. Stranded passengers were being offered free drinking water. They were also being given meals if delays extended beyond lunchtime, airport staff reported.

While snow showers have subsided, cold temperatures are expected over the coming days. Day time temperatures are unlikely to reach above 0°C and may fall as low as -12°C at night.

In Beijing, snowfall is the heaviest since weather data began in 1955, according to the Chinese government sources. Twenty months ago China suffered an estimated 151.65 billion yuan [$22 billion] in direct economic losses when the country's south was covered by the most severe snowstorms in five decades.

Power grids were knocked out and drinking water was disrupted. Millions of travellers were stranded during the annual Lunar New Year celebrations, forcing thousands of factories to suspend work and causing China's industrial production to expand at the slowest pace in more than a year.

Last year's snowstorm destroyed 11.9 million hectares [29.4 million acres] of cropland, forcing the government to hand out 63.3 billion yuan of subsidies to farmers.

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Last domino fails to fall at Berlin Wall

Monday's cellebrations in Berlin to mark the fall of the fall of the Berlin Wall were climaxed with a fireworks display. To set off the display 1,000 large dominoes had been set up each painted by schools across the country with various designs and unveiled on 7th November by Berlin's mayor Klaus Wowereit. They were placed along the original route of the former Berlin Wall in front of the Brandenburg Gate to the Potsdamer Platz. But not quite everything went according to plan as the 2.5 metre high dominoes were toppled. Thousands of spectators braved the rain and watched as the first domino was sent crashing into the second. The cascade of collapsing obelisques continued along the 1.5 km route to cheers of the crowd. But when the nine hundred and ninety ninth plinth fell it failed to move the last which stood firmly in place. The symbolism was all the more ironic given the last domino had been adorned with Chinese characters! 

China of course is one country which maintains a high security wall around its people in the form of an electronic net which censors access to certain websites which the government deems unsuitable. For those in the China frustrated by the Internet blocks the failure of this last domino to come crashing down was particularly pointed. News surrounding the events in Germany is particularly muted. Xinhua has not been able to ignore the anniversary altogether, but there are none of the controversial statements about the advances for freedom or the mentions of the collapse of communism. 

Several leaders spoke before the domino toppling. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown praised the ordinary people saying, "This wall was torn down not by the demands of political leaders, not by dictat from on high, not by the force of military might but by the greatest force of all - the unbreakable spirit of the men and women of Berlin. You dared to dream in the darkness. You knew that while force has the temporary power to dominate, it can never ultimately dictate." He said that the power of people should inspire future generations. "You proved that there is nothing that cannot be achieved by people inspired by the power of common purpose. Let me thank you, the people of Berlin for showing that in a troubled world with an Africa in poverty, and a Darfur in agony, a Zimbabwe in tears and a Burma in chains, individuals even when in pain need not suffer forever without hope...What has happened here in Berlin tells the world that the tides of history may ebb and flow, but that across the ages history is moving towards our best hopes, not our worst fears; towards light not darkness; and towards the fulfilment of our humanity, not its denial."

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also spoke of the example set by ordinary people twenty years ago. "Those of us gathered here tonight, leaders and citizens alike, we must pledge ourselves to work together to advance freedoms beyond its current frontiers so that people everywhere are afforded the opportunities to pursue their dreams and live up to their God given potential," Clinton said.

Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel spoke of how she felt at the time the wall fell. "For me, it was one of the happiest moments of my life," Merkel said. Speaking not only about the fall of the wall but also the events of the second world war, she said, "Freedom must be fought for. Freedom must be defended time and again. Freedom is the most valuable commodity in our political and social system."

Speaking earlier had she lawded Gorbachev saying, "You made this possible, you courageously let things happen, and that was much more than we could expect." While there was much mention of freedom, few countries were particularly singled out. Brown had mentioned Zimbabwe, Burma and Darfur but there was no mention of the walls dividing Palestine and Israel or the electronic wall known as the Great Firewall of China that censors its citizens.

Recently the Berlin Twitter Wall was set up by the Kultur Projekte Berlin, a non-profit organisation in Germany that promotes art and culture. Twitter users were encouraged to share their memories of the tumultuous times surrounding the fall of wall 20 years ago. However, organisers also asked tweeters to write about, "which walls still have to come down to make our world a better place." The global response was sudden and overwhelming. The site was soon flooded by thousands of comments from China complaining about the Great Firewall often referred to by the hashtag #GFW. Chinese Internet users and expats living in China, circumventing the government's blocking of Twitter by using proxy servers or Twitter apps that have yet failed to be blocked, posted messages to the site. Suddenly the site had become an online protest against 21st century forms of censorship.

Messages ranged from "Fuck the GFW" to "Mr Hu (Jintao) Tear down this Firewall!" a reference to the infamous line uttered by President Ronald Reagan when he said "Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" The site itself soon became blocked by Chinese censors. But the damage had already been done. More than half the posts on the site were anti-GFW comments, many of them in Chinese. While access to the site is difficult, those with access to Twitter using various apps not yet blocked can still post to the site by adding the hash tag #fotw.

While the messages remain in cyberspace, the large physical dominoes used in Monday's celebrations are becoming much sought after. On Tuesday German authorities reported strong demand for some of the 1,000 dominoes. "In just one morning we have had 30 or 40 enquiries from firms, individuals, schools and local parishes," Dorett Auerswald, a spokeswoman for the organisers told Agence France Presse. "Some of them want to buy them, others want to know if it is possible to have them for an exhibition. It's really very touching," she said. "People tell us they saw them on television and that they were moved." For the moment, however, all the dominoes are the property of the schools and organisations around Germany that painted them, which have until Wednesday to claim them back. "If any dominoes are not taken we will keep them. They have a lot of value and we will see what we can do with them," Auerswald said. Two of the dominoes are already on their way to a museum in the western German city of Bonn, capital of West Germany before the real Wall was pulled down.

As for the last domino, it is unknown what the Chinese characters on it mean or if there was any specific meaning behind its design or its placing. Its failure to fall did create some laughter in the crowd, though the fireworks began despite the hiccup. If this domino is put up for auction, it may well attract more than a little attention, though as yet the irony has not been picked up by the media. It has been noted by many Twitter users in China however, many of which have posted their observations on the site.[BBC video]

Monday, November 09, 2009

Leaders gather at the Berlin Wall

World leaders, both past and present, are gathering in Germany Monday to mark the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Chancellor Angela Merkel is hosting British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, French and Russian presidents Nicolas Sarkozy and Dmitry Medvedev and representatives from across the European Union as well as US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the Brandenburg Gate, the symbol of German unity. Former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, ex-Polish president Lech Walesa and dissidents who helped bring down the Wall and end European communism will also attend today's event.

During a ceremony on Sunday US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, "Our history did not end the night the Wall came down. To expand freedom to more people, we cannot accept that freedom does not belong to all people. We cannot allow oppression defined and justified by religion or tribe to replace that of (communist) ideology."

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown will later pay tribute to "the unbreakable spirit of men and women who dared to dream." French President Nicholas Sarkosy has already aired his views on his Facebook page. Sarkozy shared his own memories of November 9 saying he had been in Berlin and was among the first to chip away at the Wall's concrete slabs. "We then headed for Checkpoint Charlie (border crossing) to see the eastern side of the city and finally confront this Wall and I was able to take a pickaxe to it," he wrote. 

Meanwhile Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who was posted as a KGB agent in Dresden under communism, said he had fond memories of East Germany including learning German, mountain excursions and contacts with local agents. "But we see how the Federal Republic (united Germany) is developing and we are happy that we have good relations on a new basis," he said. "This of course makes any nostalgia secondary." as well as world leaders more than 100,000 ordinary citizens are expected to attend.

The celebrations mark the events of twenty years ago. Following weeks of pro-democracy protests East Germany's Stalinist authorities suddenly opened the border on the night of November 9, 1989. After 28 years as prisoners in their own country, euphoric East Germans streamed to checkpoints and rushed past bewildered guards, many falling tearfully into the arms of West Germans welcoming them on the other side. The fall of the wall was preceded two years earlier by an historic address by the late President Ronald Reagan. On June 12, 1987, President Reagan stood before the Brandenburg Gate and said, "We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace. There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." 

Although there is some disagreement over how much influence, if any, Reagan's words had on the destruction of the Berlin wall, the speech is remembered as an important moment in Cold War history. Later this month President Barack Obama is expected to arrive in Beijing on his first visit to the country. He is not expected to follow in the footsteps of Reagan and call for greater freedoms in China and a tearing down of the so-called Great Firewall of China. Recently Chinese Internet users and expats, angry at the continued censorship in China posted comments on the BerlinTwitterwall which was set up to mark the 20th anniversary of the fall of the wall. It wasn't long before this site too became blocked. 

Many Twitter users made reference to Reagan's famous speech and called on Obama to say the words, "Mr Hu tear down this wall." In an article entitled "Does Obama Believe In Human Rights?", the Wall Street Journal questioned the president's standing on such matters. Der Spiegel had already reported that Obama had cancelled his visit to the wall to attend celebrations, and yet during his campaign he paid lip-service to the events of twenty years ago when he spoke in Berlin. "This city, of all cities, knows the dream of freedom," he had said.

But ever since claiming victory, statements pertaining to human rights have been scarce. In February, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton landed in Beijing with a conciliating message about the country's human-rights record. "Our pressing on those [human-rights] issues can't interfere on the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis and the security crisis," she said.

But there has been no pressing whatsoever on human rights. President Obama refused to meet with the Dalai Lama in September. One assumes he did not wish to ruffle feathers with the people who will now be financing his debts. In June, Liu Xiaobo, a leading signatory of the pro-democracy Charter 08 movement, was charged with "inciting subversion of state power." But as a US Embassy spokesman in Beijing told the Wall Street Journal, "neither the White House nor Secretary Clinton have made any public comments on Liu Xiaobo."

But it's not just China where statements of human rights have all but disappeared. In 2008, candidate Obama issued a statement insisting that "there must be real pressure placed on the Sudanese government. We know from past experience that it will take a great deal to get them to do the right thing. . . . The U.N. Security Council should impose tough sanctions on the Khartoum government immediately." But in mid October the State Department rolled out its new policy toward Sudan, based on "a menu of incentives and disincentives" for the genocidal Sudanese government of Omar Bashir. 

Obama staid conspicuously quiet following Iran's fraudulent elections and earlier this year the State Department denied a grant request for New Haven, Conn.-based Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. The Center maintains perhaps the most extensive record anywhere of Iran's 30-year history of brutality. The grant denial was part of a pattern: The administration also abruptly ended funding for Freedom House's Gozaar project, an online Farsi- and English-language forum for discussing political issues.

In July, Obama renewed sanctions on Burma. In August, he called the conviction of opposition leader, and fellow Nobel Peace Prize winner, Aung San Suu Kyi a violation of "the universal principle of human rights." But his administration's new policy with the Burmese junta is one of "engagement," on the theory that sanctions haven't worked. This is a government that as recently as May 2008 prevented the delivery of humanitarian aid to the victims of Cyclone Nargis. Some 150,000 people died in plain view of "world opinion," in what amounted to a policy of forced starvation.

Obama's record so far appears to be one of treating human rights as something that "interferes" with America's purposes in the world. Any expectation that he might speak out against the Chinese government's human rights record or Internet censorship is probably wishful thinking. There may be one small deciding factor and that is if such Internet restrictions affect trade as a recent report in the Australian allured to. According to the paper an upcoming report by the European Centre for International Political Economy censorship may contravenes World Trade Organisation rules, of which China is now a signatory. "Censorship is the most important non-tariff barrier to the provision of online services, and a case might clarify the circumstances in which different forms of censorship are WTO-consistent," said the study by Brian Hindley and Hosuk Lee-Makiyama.

Internet censorship can have a serious impact on businesses, the report said, noting how China's local search engine Baidu, which follows official rules on censorship, has overtaken global leader Google in the Chinese market. There have even been reports that the authorities have rerouted requests for Google.com and other international search engines to Baidu's site. WTO rules allow members to restrict trade to protect public morals or public order, but those measures must be necessary and disrupt trade as little as possible, the report adds. 

Since March this year the number of particularly western websites have been blocked or had services interrupted has grown considerably. At the time of writing these were just some of the sites inaccessible in China: YouTube, Blogger, Facebook, Typepad, Twitter, Wordpress, Flickr [partially affected], Friendfeed, Tumblr, technorati, imageshack, Picasa web albums, Scribd, Dailymotion, Liveleak, Vimeo, bit.ly, ow.ly [blocked for a short time], Twitpic, Pirate Bay, Python programming software download link, www.bing.com/twitter search, China Digital Times, WorldWeeklyNews, Danwei, dw-world.de, Amnesty, RSF, Wikileaks, Google Sites, Google Wave invite request page, Google Health [on some ISPs], Google Docs [https, http available]. In addition several popular Chinese social networking sites remain blocked including Digu, Zuosa, Fanfou and Jiwai.

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Beijing's 'hazardous air' begins to dissipate

On Thursday morning at 01:00 hrs, the US Embassy's air monitoring station in Beijing posted a message via Twitter indicating that the air was 'Hazardous'. There was nothing immediately unusual about this particular tweet. The air in Beijing can get very bad at times. But as the flow of data continued to be issued it became clear that this wasn't just a isolated event. Throughout Friday the air quality remained 'Hazardous' and Saturday too brought no change. Only by mid-afternoon on Sunday could a noticeable difference in the air quality be observed.

The US Embassy's air monitoring station has been tweeting its data since early this year. Although they only have one monitoring station, the information gathered is considered to reflect a more accurate picture of true air quality. Following guidelines set by the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] and the World Health Organisation [WHO] the US has set up air monitoring across the United States and gives out daily information via its website.

The US measure air quality using a PM 2.5 scale which is considered a more accurate reflection of the relative dangers the air can pose to health. Smaller particles are less easily coughed from the lungs and pose a greater risk to the individual. Some countries including China use a PM10 reading, larger particles which pose a hazard but are much more easily expelled from the body. The varying systems and the labelling associated with them produced widely different results. On Friday, the US Embassy's air monitoring station measured the average AQI [Air Quality Index] at 500 and Hazardous. However, China's Ministry of Environmental Protection, which does not Twitter its findings and only publishes the previous day's average readings, stated the Beijing API [Air Pollution Index] on Friday was 186 and labelled Grade 3B or Lightly Polluted. Saturday's reading was higher with an API reading of 276 and a Grade of 4B, or Heavily Polluted. Of course the @BeijingAir description is more emotive, but it is the same scale used in the US, though air quality there rarely exceeds Unhealthy.
  
Air quality hitting Hazardous would be considered an emergency in the US and public announcements would likely be made. People would be advised to avoid all physical activity outdoors. People with heart or lung disease as well as older adult and children would also be advised to remain inside. However, there was no public announcement. Few people are able to follow @BeijingAir's Twitter feed especially given that Twitter is one of the many foreign websites blocked in China. So many people continued to go about their daily business.

Seemingly oblivious to the polluted smog shrouding the city people could still be seen jogging in the Chaoyang district of east Beijing. An American exited Jenny Lou's [a store that specifically targets expats] near Ritan Park carrying a rucksack loaded with shopping and holding his small child. Neither were wearing face-masks. Near the Silk Marked there a few cyclists wearing suitable masks and some Chinese people could be spotted wearing the commonly seen surgical masks, though many may well have been using them to protect themselves from the A/H1N1 swine flu virus.

Many people did stay at home and some posted comments on Twitter. Many said it was the worst pollution they had seen. Even though Beijing's pollution has hit the top AQI level of 500 before it has not continued for more than a few hours. In fact many made note of the fact that the PM 2.5 reading continued to rise while the AQI remained stuck at 500. It seemed to indicate that the AQI may have continued well above that level, but equipment was not able to record higher readings. But what would you call the air quality above Hazardous?

Pollution in Beijing is partly created by its nearby industry and power stations, but also by its millions of cars. Partly surrounded by mountains, pollution can easily build up especially if the winds are light. The conditions over the last few days were exacerbated by what's called temperature inversion. Normally, air cools with altitude, but occasionally, a layer of cool air will be trapped beneath a layer of warm air. Since the cool air is more dense than the air above it, the two layers don't mix and pollutants build up in the cool air near Earth's surface. Temperature inversions develop most often during the winter, when long, cool nights chill the ground. The cold land cools the air nearest the ground, leaving the air at higher altitudes warmer. The two layers of air do not easily mix, and the temperature inversion can last for days if winds are calm.

But late afternoon of Sunday the pollution levels could be visibly seen to drop. The Twitter feed from @BeijingAir, which had halted at around 04:00 hrs, was not needed to see the change. At some points the bad visibility had led to some taxi drivers refusing to drive their passengers any further. But by Monday morning one could almost see the horizon. After 4 days of extreme pollution and mild temperatures, Beijingers are in for more meteorological surprises. Temperatures are dropping once again and air pressure is rising. According to Google weather, the BBC international weather reports and the Weather Channel, Beijing is likely to be hit by heavy snow tomorrow [Tuesday 10th November]. Night-time temperatures may fall as low as -6°C bringing winter to Beijing once again. As for China's own weather service, they are predicting only light snow and low temperatures of -2°C.

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Kunming man "beaten to death" by Chengguan

It has been reported on some Chinese websites that a man was beaten to death by members of Kunming's City Urban Administrative and Law Enforcement Bureau [城市管理行政执法局], also known as Chengguan [城管]. The local government agency has been established in every city in the People's Republic of China and is considered by many people to be brutal in the carrying out of its duties. Ever since the agency came into existence 10 years ago, there has been repeated criticism of them using excessive force.
 
According to reports carried on the website China Smack, Pan Huaiyong, a-37-year-old, from Zhenxiong, Zhaotong, Yunnan Province, was beaten after demanding his 3-wheel peddle-cycle be returned to him after it was earlier confiscated by authorities. Following his death more than a hundred people converged on the offices of the Chengguan in Kunming's Guandu District [pictured above].

Police arrived at the scene and the situation remained calm, but tense according to reports. China Smack says that Pan came to Kunming to make a living after his wife left him. Awaiting passengers outside the Desheng Hotel, he was approached by members of the Chengguan who attempted to confiscate his tricycle. Despite attempting to make off, Pan was beaten and his vehicle, which he used to convey passengers for a living, was taken away. The man attempted to secure the return of his tricycle the next day but due to his not having the 200 RMB [$30] he was apparently beaten and died from his injuries.

Police insist the beating to death of Pan Huaiyong is "only a claim" and reporters have been told they will have to wait for an official report to be conducted. The rumours have angered many however. Comments on Internet forums are cynical of the official explanations. One person writes, "Chengguan not beating people to death would be news." Another describes them as "mobsters posing as law enforcement."

Even when an official report surfaces, many are sceptical of its probable conclusion. "Everyone stop the fuss, leaders in Kunming are coming up with a response as we speak to contain the situation. Mostly likely the conclusion would be that the victim had a disease that suddenly killed him or he committed suicide. Our leaders usually use something like this. It’s a harmonious society," one post read. 

There is growing resentment of security officials which are often seen as little more than paid thugs. And it is not just the Chinese that are complaining. On a recent post written by the Daily Telegraph's Beijing correspondent, Peter Foster describes his own experience with a bank security guard who had taken exception to where Foster had left his bicycle. 

He also told of how a woman shopper was beaten to death by security guards outside a Chinese branch of Wal-Mart after being accused of shoplifting – wrongly as it turned out. It often comes down to training as Matthew Crabbe writes on the website AccessAsia. He says that guards fall into two types – “bao’an”, who are reasonably trained and “zhi’an” who aren’t.

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

China's fashion police ban pyjama wearers

City officials in Shanghai are clamping down on people wearing pyjamas in the streets in the lead up to the World Expo to be held in the city next year. In an article in the Chengdu Business Daily there is outrage expressed over the move, condemning it as a civil rights abuse. "Many Shanghai residents are used to loitering around the streets in their pyjamas. But now the municipal government is making every effort to stop them from doing so, because it would be a "loss of face" for city authorities if a foreigner sees people walking the streets in pajamas during the 2010 World Expo," the paper states.

The wearing of pyjamas is a common sight in China. Public and private space is often blurred in daily life and it is not unusual to see people walking around neighbourhoods dressed in clothing usually worn in the bedroom. To foreigners it is bizarre, but for most Chinese it is nothing unusual. As for losing face, this is probably a rather futile task given the many other peculiarities and bad habits seen in China. Pyjama wearing is probably the least concerning for most westerners. Spitting in the streets, dirty toilets, impoliteness and polluted air is probably more of a concern amongst most foreign visitors.

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Real or fake, Beijing's snow makes a pretty picture

On Sunday Beijing was blanketed with snow. It seemed to come as a shock and a surprise for may Beijingers. In the office on Thursday a declaration that it would snow on Sunday was met with derision. "Is that from the Western propaganda weather machine?" a Chinese colleague retorted while laughing. On the Monday he had to eat his words. And many spoke of being caught out as temperatures dropped to as low as -9 degrees Celsius. "I was so cold later," one young chap said. Many were unaware that the arctic conditions were predicted at least by several foreign news sources. On Thursday tvnewswatch posted a tweet warning of low temperatures and snow, prompted by various weather reports. However Xinhua, nor Beijing's weather services failed to warn the public of the white stuff heading towards the capital. In fact it spoke of rain and temperatures above freezing!

By Sunday morning at around 02:00 hours, Beijing time, flurries of snow were swirling in the air and by the morning Beijing was white. The airport seized up, with many flights cancelled, and roads in central Beijing were gridlocked for much of the morning. While children were enjoying the snow, building snowmen and engaging in snowball fights with their parents, others were far from amused at having been plunged into the depths of winter. Cyclists struggled along icy streets in blizzard conditions while holding umbrellas. Rickshaw drivers grimaced as they drove through the cold wind and motorists blasted their horns in vain as they sat in motionless traffic.
 
In the heart the city flower displays, set up for National Day a month ago, lay beneath a frosty covering of snow and Chinese lanterns looked more like Christmas decorations with their icy coating. Many of the trees also gave a feeling that it was December with fir trees resembling Christmas trees. Away from the traffic there was an almost magical feeling in Beijing's parks. Jingshan Park's pagodas glistened in the late autumn sunshine as flocks of birds flew around them. Children and adults were out in force taking pictures, enjoying the scenery and building snowmen. There was even a snow-pig which attracted many to pose by it for photographs.

The heavy snow also brought some destruction in it's wake. Many branches broke under the weight of the snow and workers busily shook snow from trees around the park to prevent further damage. They need not have bothered since by the late afternoon much of Beijing's icy covering had melted away. Except for a few heaps of snow swept to the edges of roads and pavements, by Monday there was little evidence of the winter weather that had descended on the city.

But then came the suggestion that the weather was not as a result of nature but due to interference by Chinese scientists. According to several reports 168 doses of silver iodide had been used to "seed" the clouds and bring the snow in order to alleviate drought conditions. Although widely reported, there was also some skepticism expressed in western media. While it is true that seeding clouds can create precipitation, it is not a precise science. It may not be that safe given crops will be saturated with silver compounds. It is almost as though, to save face from not having properly predicted the snow, it was better to say the authorities made made it snow with the help of the Beijing Weather Modification Service. Whether real, fake or modified, it was no consolation for hundreds of passengers stranded at Beijing International Airport, though it was rather pretty if not a little cold.

tvnewswatch, Beijing, China

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Bookmark sync for Google Chrome 4 beta

Google has updates its Google Chrome browser with a new beta release which allows users to synchronize bookmarks between different computers. The download has to performed manually and given it is a beta release may still have some glitches. For those who use a computer at work , desktop at home and a laptop on business travel such a facility will prove invaluable. The service is provided through the use of XMPP technology, the same Instant Messaging protocol used in Google Talk. Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) (formerly named Jabber) is an open, XML-based protocol originally aimed at near-real-time, extensible instant messaging.

Firefox has long had synchronization through the use of Xmarks, though the extension has to be added manually. The ability to sync bookmarks is likely to make Google Chrome that much more popular. It has already seen significant growth in its global user base from 3.4 percent to 3.6 percent from September to October this year. While it still lags behind Internet Explorer and Firefox, Google Chrome's simplicity, speed and functionality has attracted many users.

"As with every release, this new beta comes with many speed improvements," Google said in a statement on its blog. "In particular, as web applications we use every day become increasingly dynamic, browsers like Google Chrome need to be able to construct and change elements on web pages as fast as possible. We've improved performance scores on Google Chrome by 30 percent since our current stable release, as measured by Mozilla's Dromeao DOM Core Tests, and by 400 percent since our first stable release. Chrome was first released as a beta version for Microsoft Windows on September 2 2008. The first public stable release arrived on December 11 2008.

Meanwhile, in China such innovations are proving difficult to use. The Xmarks extension for Firefox and IE, as well as its website are currently blocked in China. Google is also struggling to maintain its presence. Many of its services are blocked or severely impeded by the so called Great Firewall of China. For those wishing to develop and use the latest technology this all slows down the ability to learn and push things forward.