tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12080117.post547477740186244862..comments2023-06-24T14:14:41.889+00:00Comments on Newswatch: CERN fails to destroy the Earth!Newsjunkyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17305954960508082514noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12080117.post-90612595542241706172008-09-11T04:37:00.000+00:002008-09-11T04:37:00.000+00:00A large percentage of the world's practicing parti...A large percentage of the world's practicing particle physicists work for CERN and are under direction not to estimate probability of risk other than no risk.<BR/><BR/>Scientists who have spoken out loudest have been attacked personally by CERN.<BR/><BR/>The number of concerned particle physicists is unknown.<BR/><BR/>Affidavit quote from the US Federal lawsuit:<BR/><BR/>"<I>CERN censors information on the risks involved. Its Chief Scientific Officer, Mr. Engelen passed an internal memorandum to workers at CERN, asking them, regardless of personal opinion, to affirm in all interviews that there were no risks involved in the experiments, changing the previous assertion of ‘minimal risk’. This happened as he himself explained in a 2007 interview in The New Yorker, due to the growing public fear. So instead of addressing the legitimate fears of the citizenship, CERN decided to hide all risks involved;</I>"[1]<BR/><BR/>[1] http://www.lhcdefense.org/pdf/Sancho%20v%20Doe%20-%20Affidavit%20of%20Luis%20Sancho.pdf AFFIDAVIT OF LUIS SANCHO IN UPPORT OF TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONJTankershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01016299097944020569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12080117.post-83144360226016861872008-09-10T22:41:00.000+00:002008-09-10T22:41:00.000+00:00"But most scientists dismiss these theories." (ref..."But most scientists dismiss these theories." (referring to doomsday scenarios)<BR/><BR/>Actuslly, ALL of the thousands of currently practicing particle physicists in the world dismiss these theories. In other words, the ones that know what they are talking about, say there is no danger.<BR/><BR/>It's unfortunate that a very few people with no expertise in the field have been able to gain so much publicity for themselves (presumably what they are after) at the expense of science (wasted time) and the anxieties of people that read that there's a controversy among scientists, when in fact there is not.<BR/><BR/>I've written about the shameful stop-the-LHC stunt and some of the people involved, especially the last-minute scientists (see post above) that have stepped in with pathetically bogus results to support their doomsday view. Check out my blog post <A HREF="http://onscreen-sci.com/?p=34" REL="nofollow">Large Hadron Collider: What’s the Risk?</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12080117.post-12399827463187731672008-09-10T14:52:00.000+00:002008-09-10T14:52:00.000+00:00Hawking Radiation has been debunked.Physicists who...Hawking Radiation has been debunked.<BR/><BR/>Physicists who re-examined Hawking Radiation in the last decade determined that micro black holes do not evaporate. Their papers conclude:<BR/><BR/>"black holes do not radiate"[1] "the effect [Hawking Radiation] does not exist."[2] "infinitely delayed Hawking radiation" [3]<BR/><BR/>Dr. Rössler, a physicist famous for invention of Chaos theory's Rössler Attractor and for founding Endophysics, calculates exponential micro black hole growth (years or decades to consume the planet).[3]<BR/><BR/>If the Large Hadron Collider WILL create micro black holes, then the odds of danger might be... possibly... a probability?<BR/><BR/>[1] xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0304042 Do black holes radiate?. Prof. Dr. Adam Helfer (2003)<BR/><BR/>[2] arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0607137, On the existence of black hole evaporationyet again, Prof. VA Belinski (2006)<BR/><BR/>[3] www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/OTTOROESSLERMINI BLACKHOLE.pdf Abraham-Solution to Schwarzschild Metric Implies That CERN Miniblack Holes Pose a Planetary Risk, Prof. Dr. Otto Rössler (2008)JTankershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01016299097944020569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12080117.post-63720035707919713482008-09-10T12:39:00.000+00:002008-09-10T12:39:00.000+00:00Great blog :)Great blog :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com